华硕 Vivobook 16 笔记本电脑评测:人工智能功能首当其冲

365050 📅 2025-09-17 19:10:53 👤 admin 👁️ 8045 ❤️ 489
华硕 Vivobook 16 笔记本电脑评测:人工智能功能首当其冲

华硕 Vivobook 16 笔记本电脑评测:人工智能功能首当其冲--真正的生产力提升还是营销炒作?据说,人工智能能让一切变得更好。 Vivobook 16 售价为 999 欧元,在显示质量、端口或其他功能方面可能并不出众,但新的人工智能处理器肯定会带来巨大的市场吸引力。Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 03/06/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 AMD AI Business Radeon Ryzen (Zen) Zen 5

最终结论 - 与多媒体相比,更适合办公任务Vivobook 16 显然是围绕其人工智能驱动的处理器设计的,配备了一系列人工智能驱动的工具和应用程序,以提高工作效率。然而,除此之外,这款笔记本电脑的其他部分给人的感觉显然很一般,使其成为办公任务的可靠选择,但除此之外就没有什么亮点了。

Test device courtesy of Asus

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Vivobook 16 的售价接近 1,000 欧元,与预期相差甚远。显示屏的色彩范围甚至连基本的 sRGB 支持都达不到,3D 性能明显低于平均水平,电池续航时间也不尽如人意,端口有限且速度较慢。此外,它的制造质量也没有达到高级标准。这款笔记本电脑目前的定价似乎过高,华硕实际上是在为其内部人工智能应用程序和功能收取溢价。

Pros+ 附加触摸板功能

+ 快速 RAM(但焊接)

+ 物理网络摄像头快门Cons- 显示屏边缘很容易脱落

- 所有 USB 端口速度都只有 5Gb/s

- 无键盘照明

- 无 SD 读卡器、无局域网、无 Wi-Fi 6E

- 低色彩 60 Hz 面板,无替代品

- Radeon 860M 性能低于平均水平

- 冷却系统不太平衡,偏右

- 运行时间相对较弱

价格和供应情况例如,华硕 Vivobook 16 M1607K 在Notebooksbilliger 的售价为 999 欧元。

$6.952PCS Keyboard Cover for 16" ASUS VivoBook 16X OLED F1603 M1603 X1603 M1605 F1605, VivoBook Pro 16X OLED K3605 K6602 TN3604, VivoBook Pro 15X K6501 M6501 K3502 M3502 M1503, Vivobook Go 15.6" E1504FA$513.07ASUS Vivobook 16 Laptop, 16” WUXGA 60Hz Display, Intel Core i5-13420H, Intel Iris Xᵉ Graphics, 16GB Memory, 512GB Storage, Windows 11, Cool Silver, F1605VA-ES56$559.99ASUS Vivobook 16 Laptop, 16” WUXGA 60Hz Display, Intel Core i7-13620H, Intel UHD Graphics, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD, Windows 11, Cool Silver, F1605VA-BS74

Bestpreis 749 € nullprozentshop.deASUS VivoBook 16 M1607KA-MB058W, Cool Silver, Ryzen AI 7 350, 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD, DE (90NB15F2-M004L0)2. 749 € notebooksbilliger.de3. 755.29 € notebooksbilliger.at

潜在的竞争对手比较

ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightHeightDisplay

1.77.6%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $6.952PCS Keyboard Cover for 16" ...2. $513.07ASUS Vivobook 16 Laptop, 16�...3. $559.99ASUS Vivobook 16 Laptop, 16�...1.9 kg19.9 mm16.00"1920x1200142 PPIIPS

2.83%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSDAmazon: $760.42List Price: 750 USD1.8 kg17.5 mm16.00"1920x1200142 PPIIPS

3.77.3%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $799.99HP Pavilion Plus 16 inch Lap...2. $24.95mCover Case ONLY Compatible ...3. $111.11GD03XL N66215-005 Replacemen...List Price: 730 EUR1.7 kg18.6 mm16.00"1920x1200142 PPIIPS

4.89.7% v7 (old)Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $19.97Slim Laptop Sleeve 14-16 Dev...2. $18.98Puccy 2 Pack Back Protector ...3. $20.99Vaxson 2-Pack Clear Protecto...List Price: 957€1.9 kg15.9 mm16.00"3072x1920226 PPIIPS

5.80%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $18.98Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,...2. $18.99Vaxson 2-Pack Protector Film...3. $15.99Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector...List Price: 799 Euro1.8 kg24 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIIPS

6.82.6%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSDAmazon: $690.00List Price: 960 Euro1.9 kg15.2 mm16.00"1920x1200142 PPIIPS LED

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

Table of Contents最终结论 - 与多媒体相比,更适合办公任务规格构造和功能--欺骗性的军用标准输入设备 - 附加触摸功能显示屏 - Vivobook 的色彩范围不符合 sRGB 标准性能--人工智能驱动的生产力排放与功率 - 单风扇Notebookcheck 总体评分

与更高级的 Vivobook S16 相比,Vivobook S16 重量更轻、端口更好、显示屏更出色,而 Vivobook 16 则是更经济实惠的经济型选择--假设近 1000 欧元仍可被视为经济实惠的话。在 Vivobook 16 的宣传册中,华硕用 10 页的篇幅大力宣传其人工智能功能(来自 Windows 11 24H2 和自己的软件),并将Ryzen AI 7 350是其营销战略的核心。但是,除了 AI 功能之外,这款笔记本电脑到底能提供什么呢?

规格

Vivobook 16 (Ryzen AI 7 350) (Vivobook 16 Series)ProcessorAMD Ryzen AI 7 350 8 x 2 - 5 GHz, 50 W PL2 / Short Burst, 40 W PL1 / Sustained, Krackan Point (Zen 5)Graphics adapterAMD Radeon 860MMemory16 GB , Micron DDR5, solderedDisplay16.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 142 PPI, B160UAN04.3 (AUOA5AB), IPS, glossy: no, HDR, 60 Hz, Adaptive SyncMainboardAMD Promontory/Bixby FCHStorageMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, 1024 GB , 867 GB freeSoundcardAMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio ControllerConnections4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 headset jackNetworkingRealtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.3Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 357 x 250.6Battery42 WhChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 HomeCameraWebcam: Full-HD WebcamPrimary Camera: 2 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months WarrantyWeight1.941 kg, Power Supply: 221 gLinksAsus homepageAsus notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

构造和功能--欺骗性的军用标准Vivobook 16 有两种颜色可供选择:深蓝色和银色。在我们的测试机型中,只有顶部和底座是银色的,这两处比较光滑,容易留下指纹,而质地较软的底部则采用了非常浅的灰色。所有部件均由塑料制成。

Vivobook 16 的厚度不到 2 厘米,比大多数直接竞争对手略显笨重,因为后者往往更薄。不过,就整体尺寸而言,两者的差异微乎其微。重量为 1.9 千克,偏重。

底部由 10 颗两种不同长度的螺丝固定,拆卸十分方便。在内部,你可以看到散热风扇、M.2 固态硬盘插槽、Wi-Fi 模块和一个空的单内存插槽,以便将来升级。

内部单风扇冷却系统

内存插槽(焊接 16GB)

可更换的 Wi-Fi 模块

美光 2500 固态硬盘

底座有轻微的弯曲,但依然保持稳定,只是偶尔会发出吱吱声。相比之下,180 度的盖子尽管获得了军工级认证,但却显示出其脆弱性,即使是最轻微的弯曲也会导致显示屏的塑料边框翘起。

扭转笔记本电脑时,显示屏边框开始抬起Vivobook 16 提供四个 USB 端口,其中两个是 USB Type-C。不过,所有 USB 端口都只有 3.2 Gen 1,这意味着它们传输数据的速度只有 USB 3.0 的 5 Gb/s,感觉已经过时了,尤其是 USB-C 端口。不过,Type-C 端口确实支持 Power Delivery 和 DisplayPort。没有 SD 读卡器,也没有 LAN 端口。与 华硕 TUF GAMING A16一样,除了一个 USB-A 插槽外,所有端口都位于左侧。这个位置可能会造成潜在的干扰,尤其是 USB-A 和 HDMI 插槽之间。

尺寸比较

Ninkear A16 Pro Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 DIN A4 ❌

左:USB-C (5Gb/s)、HDMI 2.1、USB-A (5Gb/s)、USB-C (5Gb/s)、耳机插孔

右侧USB-A(5Gb/秒)遗憾的是,Vivobook 不支持 Wi-Fi 6E,甚至不支持 Wi-Fi 7,所以你只能使用 5 GHz 和 2.4 GHz 网络。无线性能比较稳定,但略低于 1 Gb/s。全高清红外网络摄像头与 华硕 TUF Gaming A16全高清红外网络摄像头与华硕 TUF Gaming A16 的摄像头不同,它具有不错的清晰度和中低色彩偏差,还配备了物理快门。

Networking

iperf3 transmit AXE11000Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm FastConnect 7800

1219 (859min - 1436max) MBit/s +46%Average of class Office (47.8 - 1793, n=78, last 2 years)

1107 MBit/s +33%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRealtek RTL8852BE

834 (802min - 867max) MBit/s Ninkear A16 ProRealtek RTL8852BE

803 (755min - 846max) MBit/s -4%Average Realtek RTL8852BE (536 - 926, n=59)

791 MBit/s -5%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngRealtek RTL8852BE

744 (647min - 806max) MBit/s -11%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Wi-Fi 6 AX203

714 (656min - 790max) MBit/s -14%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211

671 (610min - 705max) MBit/s -20% iperf3 receive AXE11000Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm FastConnect 7800

1736 (1645min - 1771max) MBit/s +88%Average of class Office (104.2 - 1775, n=79, last 2 years)

1287 MBit/s +39%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRealtek RTL8852BE

924 (883min - 942max) MBit/s HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngRealtek RTL8852BE

915 (879min - 940max) MBit/s -1%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211

901 (877min - 918max) MBit/s -2%Ninkear A16 ProRealtek RTL8852BE

898 (855min - 915max) MBit/s -3%Average Realtek RTL8852BE (455 - 985, n=60)

858 MBit/s -7%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Wi-Fi 6 AX203

530 (431min - 644max) MBit/s -43% iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHzAverage of class Office (385 - 2157, n=47, last 2 years)

1320 MBit/s Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm FastConnect 7800

1232 (847min - 1452max) MBit/s iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHzLenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm FastConnect 7800

1729 (1616min - 1764max) MBit/s Average of class Office (1065 - 2270, n=48, last 2 years)

1597 MBit/s

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm FastConnect 7800; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1232 (847-1452) Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm FastConnect 7800; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1729 (1616-1764) Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (802-867) Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX203; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø714 (656-790) HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø744 (647-806) Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø671 (610-705) Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm FastConnect 7800; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1219 (859-1436) Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (883-942) Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX203; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø530 (431-644) HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø915 (879-940) Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø901 (877-918) Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm FastConnect 7800; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1736 (1645-1771)

4 ∆E1.8 ∆E8.8 ∆E5.9 ∆E8.2 ∆E6.1 ∆E1.8 ∆E12.8 ∆E6.4 ∆E2.6 ∆E5 ∆E3 ∆E9.5 ∆E4.1 ∆E9.9 ∆E4.8 ∆E11.1 ∆E11.3 ∆E6.4 ∆E4.2 ∆E7.6 ∆E7.9 ∆E6.5 ∆E5.5 ∆EColorChecker Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K: 6.47 ∆E min: 1.78 - max: 12.75 ∆E

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K

可持续性即使提出要求,华硕也没有提供关于所用材料的可持续性或是否包含可回收部件的信息。不过,包装几乎全部由可堆肥纸板制成。

输入设备 - 附加触摸功能按键尺寸为 1.6 x 1.6 厘米,方向键和 F 键的高度减半,后者也更窄。键程为 1.7 毫米,反馈明显,噪音适中,但空格键的声音稍大。虽然没有背光,但明亮的按键标签在正常情况下很容易读取。

触摸板略有放大,新增的智能手势功能也很方便。沿左侧边缘轻扫可调节音量,沿右侧边缘轻扫可控制亮度,沿顶部轻扫可滚动浏览内容。点击的感觉有点浅,左键点击有轻微的响声,但声音并不大。

键盘

1.7 毫米键程

特殊按键

触摸板显示屏 - Vivobook 的色彩范围不符合 sRGB 标准亚像素结构清晰可见的哑光显示屏

无明显渗光华硕使用的是刷新率仅为 60 Hz 的 1,200p 16:10 IPS 雾面面板,似乎没有替代型号。标称的 300 尼特亮度得到了证实,照度达到了 89%。

黑阶和对比度都很稳定,但面板的运行速度相当慢。没有 PWM 闪烁,背光出血也几乎看不出来。

该显示器的一个显著弱点是色域覆盖率较低,只有 55% 的 sRGB 色域,明显低于平均水平,尤其是对于多媒体笔记本电脑而言。这正是像 小米红米笔记本 Pro甚至更实惠的 宁凯 A16 Pro都比它出色。

320cd/m²289cd/m²311cd/m²297cd/m²326cd/m²301cd/m²294cd/m²300cd/m²292cd/m²

Distribution of brightnessB160UAN04.3 (AUOA5AB) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 326 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 303.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16.9 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 89 %Center on Battery: 325 cd/m²Contrast: 1358:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.48 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}calibrated: 4.92ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.85 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)55.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D)36.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.79CCT: 6739 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KB160UAN04.3 (AUOA5AB), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 HzLenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLLEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 HzHP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngCMN1640, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 HzXiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16", 165 HzNinkear A16 Procso1623, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 HzLenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GELEN160WUXGA , IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16", 60 HzDisplay12%13%129%83% Display P3 Coverage (%)36.841.6 13%41.6 13%98.8 168%68.7 87% sRGB Coverage (%)55.361.2 11%62.4 13%100 81%97.6 76% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)3843 13%43 13%89.9 137%71.1 87%Response Times36%9%12%51%12% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)36 ?(17.4, 18.6)18.4 ?(10, 8.4) 49%30.7 ?(14.8, 15.9) 15%39.2 ?(15.8, 18.4) -9%16.4 ?(8.2, 8.2) 54%27 ?(11.8, 15.2) 25% Response Time Black / White * (ms)21.4 ?(12.8, 8.6)16.5 ?(8.5, 8) 23%20.8 ?(11.8, 9) 3%14.6 ?(4.4, 10.2) 32%11.2 ?(6.2, 5) 48%21.6 ?(12.1, 9.5) -1% PWM Frequency (Hz)Screen-22%11%32%21%3%Brightness middle (cd/m²)326321.2 -1%324 -1%520 60%393.6 21%315 -3%Brightness (cd/m²)303319 5%295 -3%510 68%398 31%298 -2%Brightness Distribution (%)8992 3%88 -1%93 4%91 2%91 2%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.240.37 -54%0.2 17%0.35 -46%0.44 -83%0.17 29%Contrast (:1)1358868 -36%1620 19%1486 9%895 -34%1853 36%Colorchecker dE 2000 *6.488.7 -34%5.13 21%2.9 55%2.32 64%6.5 -0%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *19.4219.85 -2%16.11 17%6.2 68%3.72 81%26.5 -36%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *4.921.82 63%2.99 39%1.1 78%1.05 79%Greyscale dE 2000 *3.859.2 -139%4.24 -10%4.3 -12%2.69 30%4.1 -6%Gamma2.79 79%2.83 78%2.3 96%2.19 100%2.38 92%2.33 94%CCT6739 96%6200 105%7318 89%7422 88%6086 107%6064 107%Total Average (Program / Settings)9% /

-6%11% /

11%58% /

50%52% /

39%8% /

4%* ... smaller is better

华硕提供的面板在灰度和色彩精确度方面都存在明显偏差。虽然在手动校准后灰度有明显改善,但色彩仍然不准确。因此,这款面板并不适合用于精确的图像或视频编辑。

灰度

饱和度

颜色检查器

灰度校准

饱和度校准

色彩校验仪已校准

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White21.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.8 ms rise↘ 8.6 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.4 ms rise↘ 18.6 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8255 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0% 亮度25% 亮度50% 亮度75% 亮度100% 亮度在室外,显示内容比较容易看清,不过图像确实显得比较模糊。

户外活动

室外斜视角度性能--人工智能驱动的生产力其核心是 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Vivobook 的核心是 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350,辅以微软的 Pluton 芯片,可直接在设备上安全存储密码等密钥。它还配备了 16 GB 内存(可扩展至 32 GB)和 1 TB SSD。华硕将 Vivobook 定位为一款轻量级人工智能生产力笔记本电脑,不过其乏善可陈的显示屏可能会限制用户的内容体验。

测试条件MyAsus 软件提供了影响性能的风扇配置文件。在测试中,我们使用了标准风扇配置文件。下表显示了 Cinebench R23 中每个风扇配置文件的 TDP 值。

华硕粉丝简介

无法禁用更新搜索

Cinebench R23

低音模式

标准模式

性能模式

全速

电池

循环开始时的功耗峰值

32 W

50 W

60 W

60 W

39 W

恒定功耗

27 W

40 W

43 W

35 W

处理器华硕使用 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350这是一款 Zen 5 CPU,拥有 8 个内核,主频高达 5 GHz。它还集成了一个 XDNA-2 NPU,具有 50 TOPS,用于本地 AI 工作负载。

在 Cinebench 循环测试中,最初几次性能下降约 17%,之后性能保持相对稳定。

在所有 CPU 测试中,Vivobook 16 的排名居中。在 Ryzen 5 8540U和 酷睿至尊 5 125U的性能明显优于 酷睿至尊 7 155H在 红米笔记本则明显领先。处理器 Ryzen 7 8845HS的 Ninkear A16 Pro不相上下。

在电池模式下,CPU 性能大约会损失 6% 至 7%。

Cinebench R15 multi endurance test

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2019 (1940.52-2419.4) Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U: Ø1495 (1392.95-1639.81) HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng AMD Ryzen 5 8540U: Ø1511 (1423.89-1594.39) Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2433 (2259.12-2745.18) Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2337 (2329.51-2341.78) Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100: Ø1505 (1473.3-1556.24)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean CPU Performance Rating

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

84.1 pt Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

79.8 pt Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

79.8 pt Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

79.4 pt HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

62.9 pt Average of class Office

61.1 pt Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

59.2 pt Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

49.3 pt Cinebench R23 / Multi Core

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

17401 Points +21%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (12647 - 17899, n=11)

15623 Points +9%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

15026 Points +4%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

14383 Points Average of class Office (1577 - 20399, n=83, last 2 years)

10399 Points -28%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

10096 (9532.62min - 10096.1max) Points -30%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

9781 Points -32%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

7746 Points -46%Cinebench R23 / Single Core

Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1916 - 2006, n=11)

1961 Points 0%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

1953 Points Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1759 Points -10%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

1737 Points -11%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

1723 Points -12%Average of class Office (708 - 2130, n=83, last 2 years)

1605 Points -18%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

1561 Points -20%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

1104 Points -43%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

6671 Points +22%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (4897 - 6990, n=10)

6097 Points +11%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

5883 Points +7%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

5483 Points Average of class Office (590 - 8086, n=81, last 2 years)

4086 Points -25%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

3962 Points -28%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

3870 Points -29%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

3097 Points -44%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)

Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (751 - 784, n=10)

768 Points +1%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

761 Points Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

673 Points -12%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

672 Points -12%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

667 Points -12%Average of class Office (285 - 815, n=81, last 2 years)

630 Points -17%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

606 Points -20%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

420 Points -45%Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2745 (2259.12min - 2745.18max) Points +13%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

2419 (1940.52min - 2419.4max) Points Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

2342 (2329.51min - 2341.78max) Points -3%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1325 - 2660, n=11)

2319 Points -4%Average of class Office (246 - 3132, n=85, last 2 years)

1705 Points -30%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

1640 (1392.95min - 1639.81max) Points -32%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

1594 (1423.89min - 1594.39max) Points -34%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

1556 (1473.3min - 1556.24max) Points -36%Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

294 Points Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

272 Points -7%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

270 Points -8%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (112.5 - 305, n=11)

258 Points -12%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

256 Points -13%Average of class Office (99.5 - 312, n=83, last 2 years)

243 Points -17%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

227 Points -23%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

215 Points -27%Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

399 Seconds * -62%Average of class Office (163 - 1956, n=84, last 2 years)

384 Seconds * -56%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

351 Seconds * -43%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

328 Seconds * -33%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

246 Seconds * Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (182 - 386, n=11)

229 Seconds * +7%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

216 Seconds * +12%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

190 Seconds * +23%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

68254 MIPS +42%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

65460 MIPS +36%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (48124 - 63807, n=10)

55970 MIPS +16%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

48124 MIPS Average of class Office (7532 - 76886, n=85, last 2 years)

41793 MIPS -13%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

40137 MIPS -17%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

39575 MIPS -18%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

32811 MIPS -32%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

6162 MIPS HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

6079 MIPS -1%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (5544 - 6162, n=10)

5991 MIPS -3%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

5662 MIPS -8%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

5486 MIPS -11%Average of class Office (3046 - 6497, n=84, last 2 years)

5365 MIPS -13%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

4675 MIPS -24%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

4550 MIPS -26%Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

13501 Points +25%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

13056 Points +21%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (6586 - 14028, n=12)

12406 Points +15%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

11508 Points +7%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

10774 Points HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

9280 Points -14%Average of class Office (757 - 14998, n=93, last 2 years)

9228 Points -14%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

8476 Points -21%Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

2836 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1114 - 2882, n=12)

2625 Points -7%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

2618 Points -8%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

2504 Points -12%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2414 Points -15%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

2383 Points -16%Average of class Office (462 - 2894, n=93, last 2 years)

2280 Points -20%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

2129 Points -25%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

13276 Points +33%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

11516 Points +15%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (6705 - 12458, n=12)

10966 Points +10%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

9997 Points Average of class Office (1532 - 14192, n=83, last 2 years)

8274 Points -17%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

7672 Points -23%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

7632 Points -24%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

6244 Points -38%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

1955 Points HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

1872 Points -4%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (805 - 2135, n=12)

1852 Points -5%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

1816 Points -7%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1801 Points -8%Average of class Office (510 - 2128, n=84, last 2 years)

1688 Points -14%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

1581 Points -19%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

1576 Points -19%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset

Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (16.2 - 22.9, n=10)

19.9 fps +3%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

19.5 fps +1%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

19.4 fps Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

18.7 fps -4%Average of class Office (1.72 - 22.4, n=82, last 2 years)

11.7 fps -40%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

11.5 fps -41%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

10.5 fps -46%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

6.02 fps -69%LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF

HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

63.1 s * -13%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (45.8 - 112.6, n=11)

60.8 s * -9%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

59 s * -6%Average of class Office (41.5 - 129.6, n=82, last 2 years)

56 s * -1%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

55.6 s * Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

51.7 s * +7%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

47.2 s * +15%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

45.7 s * +18%R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

0.747 sec * -82%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U

0.555 sec * -35%Average of class Office (0.4098 - 1.06, n=81, last 2 years)

0.537 sec * -31%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

0.4908 sec * -20%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U

0.4879 sec * -19%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (0.403 - 0.998, n=11)

0.4746 sec * -16%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

0.4692 sec * -14%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

0.4098 sec * * ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit4517

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit4911 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit48792

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit8486

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit3.6 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit28.96 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit2419 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit294 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit97.9 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit145.7 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)761 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)5483 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core14383 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core1953 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core115 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core800 Points

Help... in comparison

Performance Rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance Rating

Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M

95.6 pt Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

85.6 pt Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M

77.6 pt Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

73.4 pt HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, Radeon 740M

61 pt Average of class Office

53.6 pt Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core

45.2 pt Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

33.4 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace

Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (20203 - 27796, n=10)

24406 KRay/s +7%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M

23708 KRay/s +4%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M

22795 KRay/s HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, Radeon 740M

16031 KRay/s -30%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

14272 KRay/s -37%Average of class Office (1685 - 31245, n=83, last 2 years)

11830 KRay/s -48%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core

9066 KRay/s -60%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

6174 KRay/s -73%AIDA64 / FPU Julia

Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M

99659 Points +13%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (75098 - 107379, n=10)

93434 Points +6%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M

87919 Points Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

77094 Points -12%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, Radeon 740M

68587 Points -22%Average of class Office (8977 - 125394, n=83, last 2 years)

55776 Points -37%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core

45979 Points -48%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

17585 Points -80%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3

Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M

4551 MB/s +21%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (3395 - 4322, n=10)

3946 MB/s +5%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M

3764 MB/s Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

3545 MB/s -6%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, Radeon 740M

2866 MB/s -24%Average of class Office (590 - 5398, n=83, last 2 years)

2647 MB/s -30%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

2614 MB/s -31%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core

2562 MB/s -32%AIDA64 / CPU Queen

Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M

115197 Points +71%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

88106 Points +31%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (67317 - 77400, n=10)

74197 Points +10%Average of class Office (20636 - 115197, n=83, last 2 years)

69096 Points +3%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M

67317 Points HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, Radeon 740M

64557 Points -4%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

48160 Points -28%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core

47608 Points -29%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia

Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M

14062 Points +11%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (11916 - 13677, n=10)

13079 Points +3%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M

12671 Points Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

10012 Points -21%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, Radeon 740M

8981 Points -29%Average of class Office (1064 - 18321, n=83, last 2 years)

7360 Points -42%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core

5488 Points -57%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

1501 Points -88%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel

Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M

53705 Points +16%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (39456 - 57717, n=9)

50781 Points +10%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M

46152 Points Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

37438 Points -19%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, Radeon 740M

36926 Points -20%Average of class Office (4415 - 66922, n=83, last 2 years)

29253 Points -37%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core

24922 Points -46%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

9929 Points -78%AIDA64 / CPU AES

Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M

155900 MB/s +169%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (56915 - 84817, n=10)

74496 MB/s +28%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

72068 MB/s +24%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M

58016 MB/s Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=83, last 2 years)

51565 MB/s -11%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, Radeon 740M

51450 MB/s -11%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core

48114 MB/s -17%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

44952 MB/s -23%AIDA64 / CPU ZLib

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M

1043 MB/s Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

1041 MB/s 0%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (839 - 1138, n=10)

1017 MB/s -2%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M

964 MB/s -8%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core

779 MB/s -25%Average of class Office (138.6 - 1366, n=83, last 2 years)

678 MB/s -35%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, Radeon 740M

651 MB/s -38%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

494 MB/s -53%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace

Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (10707 - 14991, n=9)

13357 KRay/s +10%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M

12361 KRay/s +2%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M

12177 KRay/s HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, Radeon 740M

8506 KRay/s -30%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

7584 KRay/s -38%Average of class Office (859 - 17834, n=83, last 2 years)

6261 KRay/s -49%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core

4468 KRay/s -63%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

3365 KRay/s -72%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

52218 MPixel/s +107%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (25283 - 47405, n=10)

40908 MPixel/s +62%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M

38801 MPixel/s +53%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, Radeon 740M

34005 MPixel/s +34%Average of class Office (9310 - 55359, n=83, last 2 years)

32366 MPixel/s +28%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

32139 MPixel/s +27%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M

25283 MPixel/s Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core

24144 MPixel/s -5%

系统性能在 PCMark 和 CrossMark 中,Vivobook 保持了自己的优势,与功能更强大的 RedmiBook Pro 和 Ninkear A16 Pro 相比,性能差距很小。虽然存储设备的延迟很低,但传输速度可能会更好,竞争对手的性能往往明显更快。不过,该系统在日常使用中感觉流畅、反应灵敏。

PCMark 10

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total PCMark 10 / Score

Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (6982 - 7732, n=9)

7411 Points +6%Ninkear A16 ProRadeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T

7344 Points +5%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

6994 Points 0%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

6982 Points Average of class Office (2823 - 7626, n=72, last 2 years)

6085 Points -13%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngRadeon 740M, R5 8540U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

5898 Points -16%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLGraphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

5761 Points -17%PCMark 10 / Essentials

Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (10801 - 12383, n=9)

11435 Points +6%Ninkear A16 ProRadeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T

11043 Points +2%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

10964 Points +2%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

10801 Points Average of class Office (6567 - 11594, n=72, last 2 years)

10081 Points -7%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLGraphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

9922 Points -8%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngRadeon 740M, R5 8540U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

9827 Points -9%PCMark 10 / Productivity

Ninkear A16 ProRadeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T

10415 Points +8%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (9674 - 11226, n=9)

10210 Points +6%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

9674 Points HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngRadeon 740M, R5 8540U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

8789 Points -9%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

8470 Points -12%Average of class Office (3041 - 10925, n=72, last 2 years)

8375 Points -13%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLGraphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

7865 Points -19%PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

9999 Points +13%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (8746 - 10028, n=9)

9475 Points +7%Ninkear A16 ProRadeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T

9346 Points +6%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

8842 Points Average of class Office (2049 - 11108, n=72, last 2 years)

7367 Points -17%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLGraphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

6648 Points -25%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngRadeon 740M, R5 8540U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

6445 Points -27%CrossMark / Overall

Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1452 - 2005, n=9)

1773 Points +5%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

1771 Points +4%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

1696 Points Ninkear A16 ProRadeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T

1652 Points -3%Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=82, last 2 years)

1438 Points -15%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLGraphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

1363 Points -20%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEAdreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

1154 Points -32%CrossMark / Productivity

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

1704 Points +5%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1337 - 1869, n=9)

1649 Points +2%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

1624 Points Ninkear A16 ProRadeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T

1562 Points -4%Average of class Office (393 - 1880, n=82, last 2 years)

1413 Points -13%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLGraphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

1353 Points -17%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEAdreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

1101 Points -32%CrossMark / Creativity

Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1696 - 2236, n=9)

2040 Points +8%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

1916 Points +2%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

1887 Points Ninkear A16 ProRadeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T

1822 Points -3%Average of class Office (319 - 2155, n=82, last 2 years)

1542 Points -18%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLGraphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

1437 Points -24%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEAdreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

1267 Points -33%CrossMark / Responsiveness

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

1572 Points +12%Ninkear A16 ProRadeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T

1456 Points +4%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1169 - 1784, n=9)

1445 Points +3%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

1401 Points Average of class Office (258 - 1877, n=82, last 2 years)

1242 Points -11%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLGraphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

1192 Points -15%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEAdreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

1067 Points -24%WebXPRT 3 / Overall

Ninkear A16 ProRadeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T

299 Points +1%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

295 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (144.3 - 328, n=10)

286 Points -3%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngRadeon 740M, R5 8540U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

285 Points -3%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngRadeon 740M, R5 8540U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

285 Points -3%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

279 Points -5%Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=78, last 2 years)

277 Points -6%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLGraphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

252 Points -15%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEAdreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

129.9 Points -56%WebXPRT 4 / Overall

Ninkear A16 ProRadeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T

257 Points +3%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (199.1 - 275, n=8)

255 Points +2%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

252 Points +1%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

249 Points HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngRadeon 740M, R5 8540U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

240 Points -4%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngRadeon 740M, R5 8540U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

240 Points -4%Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=80, last 2 years)

231 Points -7%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLGraphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

228 Points -8%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEAdreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

130.3 Points -48%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEAdreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

1079 ms * -147%Average of class Office (391 - 1966, n=87, last 2 years)

639 ms * -47%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLGraphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

583 ms * -34%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (436 - 1141, n=10)

566 ms * -30%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngRadeon 740M, R5 8540U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

553 ms * -27%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngRadeon 740M, R5 8540U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

553 ms * -27%Ninkear A16 ProRadeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T

530 ms * -22%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

528 ms * -21%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

436 ms * * ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score

6982 pointsHelp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

93443 MB/s +146%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (38001 - 106997, n=10)

80375 MB/s +112%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, Radeon 740M

70601 MB/s +86%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M

63614 MB/s +67%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

61258 MB/s +61%Average of class Office (19927 - 108783, n=84, last 2 years)

56844 MB/s +50%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M

38001 MB/s Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core

35467 MB/s -7%AIDA64 / Memory Read

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

123557 MB/s +179%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

85824 MB/s +94%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M

61558 MB/s +39%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (44209 - 63650, n=10)

61370 MB/s +39%Average of class Office (10084 - 127282, n=84, last 2 years)

58132 MB/s +31%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, Radeon 740M

50782 MB/s +15%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M

44209 MB/s Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core

38963 MB/s -12%AIDA64 / Memory Write

Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (42604 - 108475, n=10)

95432 MB/s +124%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, Radeon 740M

91931 MB/s +116%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

69181 MB/s +62%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M

68425 MB/s +61%Average of class Office (20073 - 117935, n=84, last 2 years)

60504 MB/s +42%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

47845 MB/s +12%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M

42604 MB/s Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core

36830 MB/s -14%AIDA64 / Memory Latency

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

139.9 ns * -60%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core

128.9 ns * -47%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, Radeon 740M

117.7 ns * -34%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M

117 ns * -33%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (87.7 - 107.8, n=10)

100.2 ns * -14%Average of class Office (7.6 - 162.9, n=81, last 2 years)

98.3 ns * -12%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M

87.7 ns * * ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟在打开多个浏览器标签页时,首次出现明显的延迟。我们播放 4K/60fps 的 YouTube 视频时会出现 2 次丢帧,而运行 Prime95 会进一步增加延迟。总的来说,总延迟并不特别值得注意,但在播放 YouTube 视频时,GPU 使用率的大幅波动非常突出。

YouTube

LatencyMon Main

LatencyMon 驱动程序

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95

HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngRadeon 740M, R5 8540U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

1401.7 μs * -46%Ninkear A16 ProRadeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T

1352.1 μs * -41%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLGraphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

1146.5 μs * -20%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

958.8 μs * Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB

600.7 μs * +37%* ... smaller is better

存储驱动器华硕使用的是 1 TB Micron 固态硬盘。遗憾的是,这款硬盘并没有充分发挥其潜能,在长时间使用时会出现节流问题。不过,与直接竞争对手相比,它仍然是速度较快的机型之一。

AS 固态硬盘

AS SSD 复制

Crystaldiskmark

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGNCDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:

6992 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:

6017 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:

484 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:

540 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K:

60 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K:

155 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:

521 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:

1185 MB/s

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGNSequential Read:

4948MB/s

Sequential Write:

2255MB/s

4K Read:

61.8MB/s

4K Write:

210MB/s

4K-64 Read:

928MB/s

4K-64 Write:

2569MB/s

Access Time Read:

0.09ms

Access Time Write:

0.021ms

Copy ISO:

2277.85MB/s

Copy Program:

776.63MB/s

Copy Game:

1816.23MB/s

Score Read:

1484Points

Score Write:

3005Points

Score Total:

5128Points

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGNDiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:

6993MB/s

DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:

6047MB/s

DiskSpd seq_read:

3176MB/s

DiskSpd seq_write:

3741MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:

948MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:

415MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:

62.1MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:

168.1MB/s

DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:

6360MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance Rating - Percent

Average Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

95.3 pt Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

78 pt Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

70.6 pt Average of class Office

69.1 pt Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

67.4 pt HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

60.8 pt Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

54.3 pt Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

51 pt DiskSpd

seq readAsus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

3176 (3116.01min - 3176.35max) MB/s Average Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (348 - 3632, n=10)

2941 MB/s -7%Average of class Office (121 - 4554, n=81, last 2 years)

2897 MB/s -9%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

2838 (2808.76min - 2838.27max) MB/s -11%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

2809 (2772.85min - 2809.43max) MB/s -12%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

2667 (2631.28min - 2666.65max) MB/s -16%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

2254 (2201.38min - 2254.23max) MB/s -29%Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

2073 (2068.27min - 2072.87max) MB/s -35% seq writeAverage Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (2759 - 5256, n=10)

3958 MB/s +6%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

3741 (3544.61min - 3741.18max) MB/s Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

2940 (2583.35min - 2940max) MB/s -21%Average of class Office (43 - 5842, n=81, last 2 years)

2850 MB/s -24%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

2566 (2454.93min - 2566.08max) MB/s -31%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

2522 (2448.56min - 2522.05max) MB/s -33%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

2330 (2272.26min - 2329.73max) MB/s -38%Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

1752 (1704.98min - 1752.17max) MB/s -53% seq q8 t1 readAsus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

6993 (6509.35min - 6992.53max) MB/s Average Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (6749 - 7237, n=10)

6961 MB/s 0%Average of class Office (124.2 - 7120, n=81, last 2 years)

5265 MB/s -25%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

4973 (4060.51min - 4972.89max) MB/s -29%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

4963 (4121.89min - 4963.33max) MB/s -29%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

4862 (4147.12min - 4861.83max) MB/s -30%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

3727 (3040.66min - 3726.94max) MB/s -47%Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

2107 (1922.53min - 2107.2max) MB/s -70% seq q8 t1 writeAsus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

6047 (5993.87min - 6046.58max) MB/s Average Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (5343 - 6103, n=10)

5858 MB/s -3%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

4635 (4615min - 4634.75max) MB/s -23%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

4275 (3036.68min - 4274.83max) MB/s -29%Average of class Office (46.7 - 6791, n=81, last 2 years)

3972 MB/s -34%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

3514 (2988.02min - 3513.57max) MB/s -42%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

2409 (2377.61min - 2408.59max) MB/s -60%Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

1694 (1658.88min - 1693.63max) MB/s -72% 4k q1 t1 readAverage Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (61 - 78.8, n=10)

69.9 MB/s +13%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

62.1 (61.13min - 62.11max) MB/s Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

59.2 (58.5min - 59.22max) MB/s -5%Average of class Office (5.55 - 93.1, n=81, last 2 years)

57.6 MB/s -7%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

54.8 (51.93min - 54.84max) MB/s -12%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

50.1 (49.26min - 50.13max) MB/s -19%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

49 (48.24min - 48.99max) MB/s -21%Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

47.2 (46.94min - 47.15max) MB/s -24% 4k q1 t1 writeNinkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

215 (210.88min - 215.42max) MB/s +28%Average Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (153.6 - 329, n=10)

206 MB/s +23%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

193 (186.4min - 192.95max) MB/s +15%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

168.1 (149.2min - 168.09max) MB/s Average of class Office (1.23 - 309, n=81, last 2 years)

151.2 MB/s -10%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

133.9 (129.57min - 133.87max) MB/s -20%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

126.2 (121.6min - 126.18max) MB/s -25%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

119 (115.15min - 119.02max) MB/s -29% 4k q32 t16 readAverage Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (692 - 4137, n=10)

1826 MB/s +93%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

1684 (1639.23min - 1684.06max) MB/s +78%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

1343 (1270.39min - 1342.7max) MB/s +42%Average of class Office (7.49 - 3806, n=81, last 2 years)

1225 MB/s +29%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

948 (918.78min - 947.91max) MB/s Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

905 (898.75min - 904.6max) MB/s -5%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

777 (719.1min - 776.96max) MB/s -18%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

614 (594.65min - 614.11max) MB/s -35% 4k q32 t16 writeAverage Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (415 - 3628, n=10)

1332 MB/s +221%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

1142 (1093.19min - 1142.3max) MB/s +175%Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

1020 (998.49min - 1019.8max) MB/s +146%Average of class Office (1.5 - 3337, n=81, last 2 years)

828 MB/s +100%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

720 (705.93min - 720.13max) MB/s +73%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

415 (366.84min - 415.07max) MB/s HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

376 (354.58min - 375.55max) MB/s -9%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

334 (322.9min - 334.16max) MB/s -20%AS SSD

Score TotalAverage Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (3292 - 9065, n=10)

6416 Points +25%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

5128 Points Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

4369 Points -15%Average of class Office (799 - 8001, n=78, last 2 years)

4212 Points -18%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

4153 Points -19%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

3736 Points -27%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

3422 Points -33%Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

2665 Points -48% Score ReadAverage Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (1049 - 3311, n=10)

1975 Points +33%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

1697 Points +14%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

1511 Points +2%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

1484 Points Average of class Office (383 - 3256, n=78, last 2 years)

1458 Points -2%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

1141 Points -23%Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

1115 Points -25%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

1080 Points -27% Score WriteAverage Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (1773 - 5036, n=10)

3500 Points +16%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

3005 Points Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

2107 Points -30%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

2076 Points -31%Average of class Office (247 - 3808, n=78, last 2 years)

2067 Points -31%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

1827 Points -39%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

1647 Points -45%Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

988 Points -67% Seq ReadAverage Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (4726 - 5599, n=10)

5272 MB/s +7%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

4948 MB/s Average of class Office (925 - 5796, n=78, last 2 years)

3996 MB/s -19%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

3735.3 MB/s -25%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

3670 MB/s -26%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

3477.27 MB/s -30%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

3252 MB/s -34%Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

1905 MB/s -61% Seq WriteAverage Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (2255 - 5036, n=10)

3615 MB/s +60%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

2714 MB/s +20%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

2640.48 MB/s +17%Average of class Office (294 - 5207, n=78, last 2 years)

2592 MB/s +15%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

2364 MB/s +5%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

2255 MB/s HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

1990.01 MB/s -12%Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

1575 MB/s -30% 4K ReadAverage Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (53.6 - 108.4, n=10)

71.9 MB/s +16%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

61.8 MB/s Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

59.54 MB/s -4%Average of class Office (18 - 88.2, n=78, last 2 years)

57.1 MB/s -8%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

51.1 MB/s -17%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

46.9 MB/s -24%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

46.41 MB/s -25%Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

42.9 MB/s -31% 4K WriteAverage Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (75.6 - 307, n=10)

230 MB/s +10%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

210 MB/s Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

193.7 MB/s -8%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

182.5 MB/s -13%Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

178.5 MB/s -15%Average of class Office (28.2 - 245, n=78, last 2 years)

164.6 MB/s -22%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

163.29 MB/s -22%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

157.87 MB/s -25% 4K-64 ReadAverage Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (511 - 2662, n=10)

1376 MB/s +48%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

1279 MB/s +38%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

1138 MB/s +23%Average of class Office (272 - 2643, n=78, last 2 years)

1001 MB/s +8%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

928 MB/s Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

881 MB/s -5%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

746.67 MB/s -20%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

647.31 MB/s -30% 4K-64 WriteAverage Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (1267 - 4408, n=10)

2908 MB/s +13%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

2569 MB/s HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

1714.08 MB/s -33%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

1653 MB/s -36%Average of class Office (183.4 - 3370, n=78, last 2 years)

1644 MB/s -36%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

1404.87 MB/s -45%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

1217 MB/s -53%Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

652 MB/s -75% Access Time ReadLenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

0.105 ms * -17%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

0.098 ms * -9%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

0.09 ms * Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

0.088 ms * +2%Average of class Office (0.025 - 0.302, n=77, last 2 years)

0.08104 ms * +10%Average Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (0.02 - 0.111, n=10)

0.0695 ms * +23%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

0.06 ms * +33%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

0.022 ms * +76% Access Time WriteLenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLSK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N

0.307 ms * -1362%Ninkear A16 ProAuthorain NV900-1T

0.12 ms * -471%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngSK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N

0.113 ms * -438%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024YMTC PC300-1TB

0.101 ms * -381%Average of class Office (0.016 - 0.625, n=78, last 2 years)

0.07028 ms * -235%Average Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN (0.012 - 0.052, n=10)

0.0235 ms * -12%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

0.021 ms * Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEWD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

0.02 ms * +5%* ... smaller is better

Sustained read performance: DiskSpd read loop, queue depth 8

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6360 (2361.91-6999.04) Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3428 (2126.72-4927.26) HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4831 (2934.96-4951.38) Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3215 (2929.72-3237.37) Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2073 (1608.86-2117.7) Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3148 (2231.1-4875.67)

图形卡集成 AMD Radeon 860MVivobook 中集成的 AMD Radeon 860M 未能给人留下深刻印象,在 3DMark 合成测试和游戏基准测试中均表现平平。在标准模式下,它的性能仅相当于 AMD Radeon 740MPavilion 的水平,甚至与 英特尔图形 4 核 iGPU的水平。在性能模式下,3D 性能提高了约 5%(3DMark 11)。

只有较老或要求不高的游戏才能在中高设置下流畅运行。对于大多数游戏来说,需要最低设置,即便如此,对于《赛博朋克》等游戏来说也是不够的。至少 30 分钟的《赛博朋克》测试序列仍然相当稳定(尽管设置较低)。

在电池模式下再运行Fire Strike ,性能只下降了约 5%。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 -1! Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

100 pt Ninkear A16 ProAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

87.8 pt Average AMD Radeon 860M

74.7 pt Average of class Office

58.6 pt HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Radeon 740M, AMD Ryzen 5 8540U

52 pt Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

48.2 pt Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U

46.9 pt Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE -2! Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

34.2 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

13381 Points +94%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

12550 Points +82%Average AMD Radeon 860M (6901 - 12149, n=10)

10739 Points +56%Average of class Office (1468 - 16418, n=76, last 2 years)

7856 Points +14%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Radeon 740M, AMD Ryzen 5 8540U

6932 Points 0%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

6901 Points Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U

6164 Points -11%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

4031 Points -42%3DMark

1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsNinkear A16 ProAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

49373 Points +101%Average AMD Radeon 860M (24614 - 42133, n=6)

37666 Points +53%Average of class Office (8594 - 55338, n=47, last 2 years)

31392 Points +28%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Radeon 740M, AMD Ryzen 5 8540U

30760 Points +25%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U

25804 Points +5%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

24614 Points 1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsXiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

9650 Points +117%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

7993 Points +80%Average AMD Radeon 860M (4449 - 7935, n=10)

6937 Points +56%Average of class Office (736 - 10476, n=78, last 2 years)

5568 Points +25%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Radeon 740M, AMD Ryzen 5 8540U

4843 Points +9%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

4449 Points Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U

4289 Points -4%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

3697 Points -17%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsXiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

3656 Points +121%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

2732 Points +65%Average AMD Radeon 860M (1656 - 2987, n=10)

2568 Points +55%Average of class Office (322 - 4415, n=75, last 2 years)

1984 Points +20%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

1656 Points Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U

1639 Points -1%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Radeon 740M, AMD Ryzen 5 8540U

1600 Points -3%

3DMark 06 1280x720 Score

14855 points3DMark Vantage P Result

24821 points3DMark 11 Performance

6804 points3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score

149978 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score

22791 points3DMark Fire Strike Score

3999 points3DMark Time Spy Score

1883 pointsHelp... in comparison

Blender

v3.3 Classroom CPULenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

711 Seconds * -87%Average of class Office (245 - 3964, n=80, last 2 years)

651 Seconds * -71%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U

603 Seconds * -58%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Radeon 740M, AMD Ryzen 5 8540U

598 Seconds * -57%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

381 Seconds * Average AMD Radeon 860M (283 - 630, n=11)

370 Seconds * +3%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

352 Seconds * +8%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

344 Seconds * +10% v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/IntelLenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U

416 Seconds * Average of class Office (204 - 416, n=7, last 2 years)

294 Seconds * * ... smaller is better

Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 Performance Rating - Percent

Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M

94.7 pt Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 -1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

90.2 pt Average of class Office

66.4 pt Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M

56.1 pt HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M

52.7 pt Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE -3! Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

49.1 pt Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

47.5 pt Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)

Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M

21.8 (18.3min) fps +96%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

21.2 (12.2min) fps +91%Average of class Office (6.13 - 29.6, n=54, last 2 years)

15.4 fps +39%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

11.1 (9.58min) fps 0%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M

11.1 (9.07min) fps HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M

10.6 (9min) fps -5%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

8.24 (6.78min) fps -26%Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T

Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M

27 fps +89%Average of class Office (6.83 - 31.6, n=43, last 2 years)

17.3 fps +21%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M

14.3 fps HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M

10.8 (9.14min, 9.23P0.1, 9.68P1) fps -24%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

10.2 fps -29%GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x

Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M

25.1 (3.5min, 16.4P1) fps +86%Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

15.9 (2.93min, 11.4P1) fps +18%Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=71, last 2 years)

15.5 fps +15%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

14.7 (2.86min, 9.71P1) fps +9%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M

13.5 (3.16min, 9.17P1) fps HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M

13.1 (2.15min, 9.35P1) fps -3%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

8.01 (2.29min, 6.29P1) fps -41%Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

30.6 fps +97%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M

27 fps +74%Average of class Office (6.45 - 36.5, n=77, last 2 years)

19.1 fps +23%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M

17.4 fps +12%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M

15.5 fps Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

14.4 fps -7%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

12.4 fps -20%Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

53 fps +110%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M

45.6 (11.1min, 17.7P1) fps +81%Average of class Office (12.8 - 61.7, n=60, last 2 years)

32.8 fps +30%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M

28.1 (6.6min, 7.86P1) fps +12%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M

25.2 (14.9min, 16.9P1) fps Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

22.8 (7.8min, 9.43P1) fps -10%Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

79.8 (51.5min) fps +101%Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M

70.6 (54.4min) fps +77%Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=83, last 2 years)

54.1 fps +36%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M

53.7 (47min) fps +35%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

47.5 (39.4min) fps +19%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

47 (28.8min) fps +18%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M

39.8 (30.7min) fps X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)

Ninkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M

40.1 fps +15%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M

34.9 fps Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

32.4 fps -7%Average of class Office (10.9 - 92.6, n=75, last 2 years)

30.6 fps -12%Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

25.1 fps -28%HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M

20.3 fps -42%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M: Ø10.5 (8.25-10.8) Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core: Ø9.91 (9.48-10.2) HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M: Ø10.1 (9.53-10.2) Ninkear A16 Pro R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø20.7 (19.3-21.1) Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS: Ø7.19 (6.83-7.37)

lowmed.highultraGTA V (2015)

125.1

113.6

33.6

13.5

Dota 2 Reborn (2015)

78.2

50.9

50.7

39.8

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)

40.6

21.6

15.5

X-Plane 11.11 (2018)

52.9

41.6

34.9

Strange Brigade (2018)

88.5

34.7

29.3

25.2

Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)

23.6

17.9

14.6

14.3

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)

24.3

18.9

12.3

11.1

排放与功率 - 单风扇噪音排放即使在闲置期间,特别是在持续工作后,风扇仍会保持活动状态,即使在耳语模式下也是如此。不过,它的运行噪音很小,峰值仅为 24 分贝。

与同类产品相比,在重负载情况下,风扇的噪音会明显增大。

Noise Level

Idle

23 / 23 / 24.67 dB(A)Load

31.72 / 42.51 dB(A)

30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud

min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A)

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGNLenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLGraphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112NHP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngRadeon 740M, R5 8540U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164NXiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TBNinkear A16 ProRadeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1TLenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEAdreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101Noise12%-3%-2%1%1%off / environment * (dB)2323.1 -0%24 -4%24.4 -6%23 -0%23.7 -3%Idle Minimum * (dB)2323.1 -0%24 -4%24.4 -6%23 -0%23.7 -3%Idle Average * (dB)2323.1 -0%25 -9%24.4 -6%23 -0%23.7 -3%Idle Maximum * (dB)24.6723.1 6%26 -5%24.4 1%23 7%23.7 4%Load Average * (dB)31.7223.2 27%38 -20%32 -1%37.68 -19%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)41.5329.2 30%37 11%37.68 9%31.9 23%Load Maximum * (dB)42.5132.6 23%39 8%39.7 7%37.41 12%47.8 -12%Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)30.6* ... smaller is better

温度办公笔记本电脑很少承受大负荷,但多媒体机器更有可能承受大负荷。因此,Vivobook 16 的单侧散热系统在负载情况下会变得很明显。由于单风扇位于右侧,该区域保持相对凉爽,而左侧则明显发热。在压力测试中,我们测得底部热点温度超过 50°C。在正常使用时,当然不会出现这样的温度。掌托始终保持凉爽。

Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk

47 °C48 °C29 °C 46 °C47 °C29 °C 24 °C23 °C22 °C

Maximum: 48 °CAverage: 35 °C

32 °C51 °C50 °C24 °C34 °C32 °C20 °C22 °C22 °C

Maximum: 51 °CAverage: 31.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 52 °C | Room Temperature 18.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 MiniMax. LoadIdleCyberpunk

22 °C22 °C20 °C 22 °C22 °C20 °C 20 °C19 °C19 °C

Maximum: 22 °CAverage: 20.7 °C

20 °C23 °C23 °C19 °C20 °C21 °C19 °C19 °C20 °C

Maximum: 23 °CAverage: 20.4 °C Power Supply (max.) 28 °C | Room Temperature 18.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 MiniMax. LoadIdleCyberpunk

45 °C45 °C27 °C 42 °C43 °C26 °C 23 °C22 °C21 °C

Maximum: 45 °CAverage: 32.7 °C

33 °C49 °C49 °C24 °C33 °C32 °C20 °C20 °C21 °C

Maximum: 49 °CAverage: 31.2 °C Power Supply (max.) 48 °C | Room Temperature 18.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 20.7 °C / 69 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24 °C / 75.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch. (+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+3.6 °C / 6.5 F).

压力测试(顶部)

电源压力测试

压力测试(底部)

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860MLenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLIntel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngAMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740MXiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPUNinkear A16 ProAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780MLenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GEQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSHeat7%-4%-4%6%6%Maximum Upper Side * (°C)4833.2 31%42 12%40.3 16%43 10%41.3 14%Maximum Bottom * (°C)5141.2 19%44 14%45.9 10%50 2%32.7 36%Idle Upper Side * (°C)2223.4 -6%26 -18%26.3 -20%24.8 -13%Idle Bottom * (°C)2326.6 -16%28 -22%27.9 -21%26 -13%* ... smaller is better

发言人遗憾的是,立体声扬声器声音较小,低音不足,但高音均衡。3.5 毫米耳机插孔可用于连接外部音频设备。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K audio analysis(-) | not very loud speakers (70.65 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 44% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)Compared to same class» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 73% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 12% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 86% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

耗电量Vivobook 的功耗相当标准。在压力测试中,它的耗电量一直超过 70 W,接近小型 65 W USB-C 电源适配器的极限。不过,在实际使用中,笔记本电脑不太可能长时间承受如此大的负载。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.4 / 0.6 WattIdle 4.7 / 8.2 / 9 Watt

Load

59 / 74 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRyzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860MLenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLUltra 5 125U, Graphics 4-CoreHP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngR5 8540U, Radeon 740MXiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-CoreNinkear A16 ProR7 8845HS, Radeon 780MLenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GESD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSAverage of class Office Power Consumption19%32%-32%-35%39%12%Idle Minimum * (Watt)4.74.3 9%4 15%4.2 11%6.5 -38%2.2 53%4.55 ?(1.5 - 13.8, n=85, last 2 years) 3%Idle Average * (Watt)8.28.9 -9%5 39%11.6 -41%10.7 -30%6.5 21%7.42 ?(3 - 14.9, n=85, last 2 years) 10%Idle Maximum * (Watt)99.1 -1%6 33%12.3 -37%11.1 -23%7.7 14%8.84 ?(4.4 - 18.6, n=85, last 2 years) 2%Load Average * (Watt)5931.7 46%40 32%61.9 -5%68.5 -16%41.6 ?(6.92 - 77.9, n=73, last 2 years) 29%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)6539.4 39%43 34%72.8 -12%21 68%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)5835.2 39%39.1 33%104.4 -80%19.9 66%Load Maximum * (Watt)7466.7 10%46 38%140.6 -90%107 -45%66.5 10%61.8 ?(11.1 - 107, n=85, last 2 years) 16%Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)57* ... smaller is better

Power consumption (Cyberpunk/stress test)

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø73 (69.12-73.55) Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.09 (6.57-11.394) Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø64.7 (59.111-70.11)

Power consumption with external monitor

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø59.8 (56.633-72.7) Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø60.8 (55.616-69.91) Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø56.4 (43.379-69.81) Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø46.9 (42.056-50.336) Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.72 (3.4753-4.4457) Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø58.4 (56.752-60.459)

电池寿命42 瓦时的电池容量偏小,导致运行时间不足。在我们进行的视频和 Wi-Fi 测试中,当亮度降低到 150 尼特时,笔记本电脑仅能维持不到 7 小时。相比之下,同类机型的电池续航时间通常更长。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

6h 50min

Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p

6h 50min

Load (maximum brightness)

1h 08min

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRyzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 42 WhLenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IMLUltra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 45 WhHP Pavilion 16-ag0057ngR5 8540U, Radeon 740M, 59 WhXiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 WhNinkear A16 ProR7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 80 WhLenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GESD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 84 WhAverage of class Office Battery Runtime24%68%151%23%296%83%H.264 (h)6.821.8 221%14.1 ?(6.83 - 25, n=16, last 2 years) 107%WiFi v1.3 (h)6.88.8 29%11.4 68%16.4 141%7.5 10%26.9 296%11.7 ?(3.83 - 31.5, n=86, last 2 years) 72%Load (h)1.11.3 18%2.1 91%1.5 36%1.881 ?(0.933 - 3.63, n=39, last 2 years) 71%Reader / Idle (h)19.222.2 ?(15.7 - 38.3, n=11, last 2 years)

Notebookcheck 总体评分Vivobook 16 是一款可靠的工作主力,没有任何突出的特点。快速的焊接内存和 AMD Ryzen AI 7(可处理本地 AI 工作负载)是最引人注目的方面。这款笔记本电脑的其他性能比较一般(或低于平均水平),包括 3D 性能。

Back to the verdict

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K

- 02/26/2025 v8

Christian Hintze

Chassis70 / 98 → 71%

Keyboard77%

Pointing Device79%

Connectivity55 / 80 → 69%

Weight64 / 20-75 → 79%

Battery73%

Display78%

Games Performance31 / 75 → 42%

Application Performance82 / 92 → 89%

AI Performance89%

Temperature88%

Noise86%

Audio54%

Camera39 / 75 → 51%

Average57%

78%

Office - Weighted Average

CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials0%Packaging50%Power Use82.5%Repairability45%Software Updates22.3% Total Sustainability Score: 33.3%

More articles related to this deviceAsus Vivobook 16 M1606K (Vivobook 16 Series)

TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 616463 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

相关推荐

如何快速融化冰冰的心?
game365备用网址

如何快速融化冰冰的心?

📅 08-26 👁️ 5061
我的世界附魔台书架摆放最高级2025
game365备用网址

我的世界附魔台书架摆放最高级2025

📅 09-15 👁️ 7301
中国黄金质量如何 口碑评价好吗
365050

中国黄金质量如何 口碑评价好吗

📅 08-30 👁️ 9719